Home › App Publishing Hub › App Store Rejection Guide › Playbook

App Store Rejection Playbook

Do not rush resubmission after a rejection email. First map the guideline trigger and evidence, then complete prioritized fixes, then submit reviewer-ready notes with reproducible paths.

End-to-End Flow

01 Map GuidelineIdentify whether it is 2.1, 2.3, 4.0, or 4.2, and map impacted screens.
02 Align EvidenceCollect rejection screenshots, reproduction path, and current build behavior.
03 Remediate by GuidelineFix feature behavior, metadata, and privacy declarations together.
04 Resubmission NoteRespond guideline-by-guideline with fixes, validation output, and test route.
Case A | Guideline 2.1 Functional Completeness

Symptom: white screen or critical flow interruption on reviewer devices

2.1 issues are often systemic rather than a single bug. Typical causes are environment-specific initialization gaps or session-edge cases. Reproduce the exact reviewer path first, then repair by critical-flow breakdown.

BeforeReviewer path: open app → login → blank page, no forward action possible.
FixAdd fallback pages, timeout retry, session-state checks, and key-route hardening.
AfterPath passes repeatedly, including unstable network scenarios.
Evidence pack: crash logs, before/after screen recording, and weak-network regression screenshots.
Case B | Guideline 2.3 Metadata Consistency

Symptom: listing claims differ from what the current app version can verify

If title, screenshots, or description mention capabilities unavailable in the app build, reviewers commonly flag misleading metadata. Reset listing assets to verifiable current-state content first.

BeforeStore screenshots show premium capabilities with no in-app entry in current release.
FixRemove non-verifiable assets and replace with true production-state screens and copy.
AfterReview path and store presentation align, reducing 2.3 risk significantly.
Evidence pack: listing revision record, release notes, and matching in-app screenshots.

High-frequency Rejection Points

  • 2.1 Functional completeness: crash, freeze, blank screen, login interruption, disabled primary actions.
  • 2.3 Metadata consistency: title, description, screenshots, and previews must match real app behavior.
  • 4.0 Privacy compliance: privacy policy, permission prompts, and actual data flow must be aligned.
  • 4.2 Design quality: avoid shell/template apps and ensure meaningful core value.

Resubmission Notes

  • Guideline mapping: state the exact guideline and impacted app area.
  • Remediation actions: list concrete logic/content/asset/permission updates.
  • Validation output: provide device, account, route, screenshots, and recording if needed.
  • Recurrence prevention: describe pre-release QA checkpoints for future builds.
Include explicit reviewer reproduction steps (account + click path + expected outcome) to reduce review back-and-forth.

If Rejected Again, What Next?

  • Compare both rejection rounds first: same unresolved root cause or newly triggered guideline?
  • Do not reuse generic notes. Submit structured guideline-by-guideline responses with fresh evidence.
  • If needed, temporarily disable high-risk non-core features to pass core flow first.
  • Document this rejection as an internal pre-submit checklist to avoid repeated failures.
Back to Rejection Guide See App Store Rejection Guide See Google Play Rejection Guide Back to App Publishing Hub